ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU-Reward Task.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.