Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448412›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2025

Plateau of practice effects and noise with repeat SDMT testing in multiple sclerosis.

Lenka Novakova, Igal Rosenstein, Markus Axelsson, Menno M Schoonheim, Ralph Hb Benedict, Tom A Fuchs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Training effects in oculography in multiple sclerosis patients: a one-year longitudinal study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Selective associations between cognitive practice effects and reactive balance adaptation in multiple sclerosis.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lenka NovakovaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7899-6395
Igal RosensteinDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-9690
Markus AxelssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Menno M SchoonheimMS Center Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2504-6959
Ralph Hb BenedictJacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2080-3631
Tom A FuchsMS Center Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-3518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is the most widely used test of cognition in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), and repeated testing is confounded by test-retest noise and practice effects.

objectiveTo investigate the extent to which SDMT practice effects build and plateau with high-frequency testing, reliable cutoffs for longitudinal change, and whether short-interval testing improves detection of cognitive decline.

methodsPwMS were tested with the SDMT monthly across 3 years. Plateau regression analyses were used to determine inflection points of practice effects, and the reliable-change was assessed. To evaluate effects of testing density on cognitive decline detection, this sample was compared with a separate low-density testing group.

resultsThe study included 71 people with relapsing-remitting MS (77.5% female), mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 37.3 (9.3), with 27.8 (21.3) SDMT assessments over 3.2 (2.4) years. The plateau of practice effects was reached after 18 repetitions (

conclusionWe observed practice effects building for eighteen SDMT assessments and test-retest variability consistent with literature. These results provide guidance on SDMT which should be accounted for with alternate versions and reliable-change methodologies.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNeuropsychological TestsPractice, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultscognitioncognitive declineMultiple sclerosispractice plateauremote testingSymbol Digit Modalities Test

Identifiers

PMID40448412
PMCPMC12357967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.