Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448406›Full record

ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for Precision Management in Ellanse-Treated Patients.

Larry Wu, Giovanni Salti, Sebastian Cotofana, Franco Vercesi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Larry WuiCare Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8020-3021
Giovanni SaltiIstituto Medico Medlight, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7336-154X
Sebastian CotofanaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-6566
Franco VercesiCentro Medico Galeno, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-1684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovative use of a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device facilitates the diagnosis and management of potential challenges associated with Ellanse treatment. Our case series of 6 patients illustrates the effectiveness of POCUS in managing challenges associated with Ellanse treatment. Ultrasound analysis is performed in all 6 patients, and management decisions are guided by ultrasound findings.

methodOur case series of 6 patients (A, B, C, D, E & F) consists of Ellanse-treated patients. They presented problems associated with (1) facial overfilling, (2) diagnostic challenges, (3) underfilling requiring POCUS-guided treatment, (4) confirmation of nodule dissolution, and (5) pretreatment vascular assessment.

resultsPatients A and B presented with complaints of facial overfilling, and ultrasound analysis attributed the overfilling to previous autologous fat grafting and hyaluronic acid filler treatments respectively. Patient C complained of facial cheekbone prominence after receiving 26 mL of Ellanse in her entire face over 3 years. The patient was reassured that her cheek prominence was secondary to neocollagenesis following ultrasound analysis and refused further intervention. Patient D had successful dissolution of a nodule associated with Ellanse, and this was confirmed with photographs and POCUS imaging. Patient E had underdevelopment of collagen in the left midcheek following initial Ellanse treatment 3 months ago. 0.2 mL of additional Ellanse was injected with a 25G cannula under POCUS guidance to the left cheek with satisfactory correction. Patient F had three previous sessions of Ellanse treatments. She underwent vascular anatomy analysis with an ultrasound Doppler mode prior to the fourth Ellanse treatment. The presence of dense neocollagenesis following Ellanse can alter vascular patterns. A preprocedural analysis is recommended in planning subsequent treatment.

conclusionOur limited case series of 6 patients provides useful insights into the effectiveness of POCUS as the initial imaging modality of choice when managing Ellanse-treated patients. POCUS imaging provides valuable diagnostic information (Patient A, B, C and D) and therapeutic purposes such as POCUS guided injection and pretreatment assessment (Patient D and E). POCUS can be the initial imaging modality of choice as it is convenient and allows clinical management to be made based on imaging findings.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersPoint-of-Care SystemsSkin AgingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUltrasonographyDermal FillersbiostimulatorEllansefacial overfill syndrome (FOS)hyaluronidasepoint‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS)transverse facial septum

Identifiers

PMID40448406
PMCPMC12125565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.