ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for Precision Management in Ellanse-Treated Patients.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reply to Commentary on Article: iCare Technique of Dissolving Ellanse M Nodules Using Collagenase: A Case Series and Experimental Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInnovative use of a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device facilitates the diagnosis and management of potential challenges associated with Ellanse treatment. Our case series of 6 patients illustrates the effectiveness of POCUS in managing challenges associated with Ellanse treatment. Ultrasound analysis is performed in all 6 patients, and management decisions are guided by ultrasound findings.
methodOur case series of 6 patients (A, B, C, D, E & F) consists of Ellanse-treated patients. They presented problems associated with (1) facial overfilling, (2) diagnostic challenges, (3) underfilling requiring POCUS-guided treatment, (4) confirmation of nodule dissolution, and (5) pretreatment vascular assessment.
resultsPatients A and B presented with complaints of facial overfilling, and ultrasound analysis attributed the overfilling to previous autologous fat grafting and hyaluronic acid filler treatments respectively. Patient C complained of facial cheekbone prominence after receiving 26 mL of Ellanse in her entire face over 3 years. The patient was reassured that her cheek prominence was secondary to neocollagenesis following ultrasound analysis and refused further intervention. Patient D had successful dissolution of a nodule associated with Ellanse, and this was confirmed with photographs and POCUS imaging. Patient E had underdevelopment of collagen in the left midcheek following initial Ellanse treatment 3 months ago. 0.2 mL of additional Ellanse was injected with a 25G cannula under POCUS guidance to the left cheek with satisfactory correction. Patient F had three previous sessions of Ellanse treatments. She underwent vascular anatomy analysis with an ultrasound Doppler mode prior to the fourth Ellanse treatment. The presence of dense neocollagenesis following Ellanse can alter vascular patterns. A preprocedural analysis is recommended in planning subsequent treatment.
conclusionOur limited case series of 6 patients provides useful insights into the effectiveness of POCUS as the initial imaging modality of choice when managing Ellanse-treated patients. POCUS imaging provides valuable diagnostic information (Patient A, B, C and D) and therapeutic purposes such as POCUS guided injection and pretreatment assessment (Patient D and E). POCUS can be the initial imaging modality of choice as it is convenient and allows clinical management to be made based on imaging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.