Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448370›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Legacy of pine invasion disrupts plant-soil feedback of native and non-native grasses.

Jan-Hendrik Dudenhöffer, Philip E Hulme

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan-Hendrik DudenhöfferDepartment of Pest-Management and Conservation, Lincoln University, Lincoln, 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1548-1436
Philip E HulmeDepartment of Pest-Management and Conservation, Lincoln University, Lincoln, 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5712-0474

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment C04X2102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-soil feedback (PSF) is a standing concept helping to explain plant species coexistence. Accumulating evidence suggests that PSF depends on the environmental context. One particularly impactful disruption of the environmental context is the invasion of alien species into a community. While PSF between native and non-native species has been linked to invasion success, the effect of an invader on PSF between resident plants has received little attention. We explored how Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) invasion impacts PSF between four resident grasses (two native and two non-native species). We grew the plants in live soil to condition species-specific soil communities, followed by a response phase where the plants were grown in conspecific and heterospecific soil. Both phases were performed with soil from uninvaded, invaded, or controlled invasion areas. Pairwise PSF between the species in uninvaded soil was negative and became neutral to positive in invaded soil. This effect persisted even after P. contorta removal. Our results suggest a destabilizing effect of P. contorta invasion on the coexistence of the resident grasses, benefitting non-natives over natives. This work exemplifies an overlooked mechanism by which an invader can alter interactions between resident species and adds a novel dimension to the context dependence of PSF.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalIntroduced SpeciesPinusPoaceaeSoilSpecies SpecificitySoilAgrostis capillarisAnthoxanthum odoratumcontext dependencyFestuca nova‐zelandieaelegacy effectsnon‐native speciesPentapogon avenoidesPinus contorta

Identifiers

PMID40448370
PMCPMC12267939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.