ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Effect of Monopolar Electrocautery and Blunt Dissection on Muscle Damage and Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Microdiscectomy.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive versus open fixation for flail chest in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study on perioperative safety and long-term outcomes.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Thermal versus cold instrument incisions in cervical dissection for oral squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares the effects of monopolar electrocautery and blunt dissection on muscle damage, inflammatory response, and bleeding control in lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of muscle damage (creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH)), inflammation (C-reactive protein levels [CRP]), and intraoperative bleeding (hemoglobin). MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-two patients (36 in each group) who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. In group A, the fascia and multifidus muscle were opened with electrocautery, and in group B, the fascia was opened with scalpel/Matzenbaum, and blunt dissection was performed with a periosteal elevator. CK, LDH, CRP, and hemoglobin levels were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 24 h. Statistical analyses used t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS CK levels at 24 h were significantly higher in group B (P<0.05). CRP levels at 1 h were significantly higher in group A (P=0.003). Hemoglobin decrease was greater in group B. There was no significant difference in LDH levels. CONCLUSIONS In our study, monopolar electrocautery was associated with less muscle damage, while a more pronounced inflammatory response was observed. Electrocautery provided better intraoperative bleeding control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.