Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448311›Full record

SynthesisAssessment2026

Evaluating the ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD Constructs: A Meta-Analytic Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the International Trauma Questionnaire.

Reuben Kindred, Suzanne Jak, Ruby Hamer, Maja Nedeljkovic, Glen W Bates

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reuben KindredSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1566-1146
Suzanne JakUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2223-5594
Ruby HamerSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2531-7955
Maja NedeljkovicSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Glen W BatesSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a widely used diagnostic tool for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). Although findings are mixed, investigations of the ITQ's internal structure have most often supported a six-factor first-order model and a two-factor second-order model. This study utilized meta-analytic factor analysis to investigate the ITQ's latent structure. A systematic search of PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations was conducted, with 57 studies (total

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescomplex post-traumatic stress disorderfactor analysisICD-11International Trauma Questionnairemeta-analysisPTSDtrauma

Identifiers

PMID40448311
PMCPMC13153442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.