Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448299›Full record

ArticleNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2025

Tackling disease-related malnutrition in resource-limited settings: An international position paper based on expert consensus.

Diana Cardenas, Ines Ribeiro Ferreira, Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia, Mario Barbagallo, Simon Lal, Rocco Barazzoni, Filomena Gomes, Working Group

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Tackling disease-related malnutrition in resource-limited settings: An international position paper based on expert consensus.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diana CardenasNutrition Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-0307
Ines Ribeiro FerreiraNOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson CorreiaDepartment of Surgery, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-4302
Mario BarbagalloMédecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium.
Simon LalNorthern Care Alliance, Salford, United Kingdom.
Rocco BarazzoniInternal Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Filomena GomesNOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-1433
Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidering the challenges of providing nutrition care in resource-limited settings (RLSs), the International Working Group for Patients' Right to Nutrition Care (WG) organized an expert meeting to propose recommendations and strategies to promote access to nutrition care and address disease-related malnutrition (DRM).

methodsAn online survey was developed to assess barriers to providing nutrition care in RLSs and was completed by 58 respondents from low- and middle-income countries between July and August 2024. During the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Congress in Milan on September 9, 2024, a panel of 30 experts discussed the results of the survey and built consensus statements aimed at defining strategies and recommendations required to address barriers to accessing disease-related nutrition care in RLSs.

resultsThe survey and expert consensus panel opinions indicated that there are barriers to delivering quality nutrition care in these settings including low or a lack of medical awareness, patient and family knowledge about DRM and its impact, nutrition risk screening and care implementation, reimbursement, medical devices, adapted diets, nutrition protocols, and access to home medical and nutrition therapy. Gaps identified included (1) epidemiological data and evidence for best practices; (2) education, training, and capacity building; and (3) strengthening health systems.

conclusionTackling DRM in RLSs is challenging because of the high burden of DRM and the fact that current guidelines from high-income countries may not be fully applicable. The WG recommend a three-step strategy to promote access to nutrition care.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityMalnutritionNutrition TherapyConsensusDeveloping CountriesHumansResource-Limited SettingsSurveys and Questionnairesmalnutritionnutrition careresource‐limited settings

Identifiers

PMID40448299
PMCPMC12242108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.