ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2025
Adolescents during wartime: Vulnerability-based profiles.
Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Envisioning the Future in Times of Global Uncertainty: Latent Profiles of Societal Threat Perceptions and Future-Oriented Resources Among University Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Adolescents during wartime: Vulnerability-based profiles.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescents in war zones face the dual burden of normative developmental challenges and stressors from their proximity to active conflict, raising critical questions about their vulnerability during wartime. The aim of the current study was to identify distinct vulnerability profiles among Israeli adolescents (ages 11-18) during Israel's ongoing Swords of Iron War. Drawing on Hobfoll's conservation of resources theory, we assessed protective factors (positive affect, resilience, and perceived social support) and one risk factor (war-related adjustment disorder symptoms). Differences in profiles were also examined in relation to demographic variables and war impact variables (house damage, displacement, and injury). In this quantitative, cross-sectional study, we utilized self-report questionnaires from 305 Jewish Israeli adolescents (ages 11-18). LatentGold was employed to conduct a three-step latent profile analysis. Wald tests were used to explore differences between the various adolescent profiles in terms of protective and risk factors, as well as to assess associations with distal variables. Three distinct vulnerability profiles were identified: low, moderate, and high. Adolescents in the low-vulnerability group were younger, lived farther from conflict borders, experienced fewer war-related adjustment disorder symptoms, and reported higher levels of positive affect, resilience, and perceived social support. Among these factors, perceived social support emerged as the most sensitive variable differentiating profiles. These findings highlight the importance of internal and external resources in mitigating vulnerability and fostering resilience among adolescents in conflict-affected regions. The categorization into vulnerability levels enables faster identification of at-risk adolescents and more efficient resource allocation. Given the critical role of social support, clinicians should prioritize interventions that enhance such support to promote adolescents' well-being during wartime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.