Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448215›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Secondary traumatic stress in household members of healthcare workers in the UK: a mixed-method survey study.

Sahra Tekin, Danielle Lamb, Talya Greene, Millie Tamworth, Dominic Murphy, Jo Billings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sahra TekinDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. sahra.tekin.20@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-704X
Danielle LambDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-9793
Talya GreeneResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-2841
Millie TamworthDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7032-4436
Dominic Murphy, Combat Stress, Tyrwhitt House, Leatherhead, KT22 0BX &, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-2743
Jo BillingsDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-2440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to long working hours, shifts, poor working conditions, and high risk of exposure to traumatic incidents at work, healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of developing mental health and wellbeing issues. Family members and close friends of HCWs are often the primary support source for the HCWs. However, while supporting the HCWs, family members' and friends' mental health and wellbeing may be impacted negatively. According to the findings of previous literature, family members of other high-risk workers may experience secondary traumatic stress. To date, there has been no research focusing on secondary traumatic stress in family members and friends of HCWs.

methodsIn this cross-sectional, mixed-method study, we examined secondary traumatic stress and associated factors amongst 320 household members (family members and housemates) of HCWs in the UK using the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the predictors of secondary traumatic stress, specifically sex, age, job role of the HCW, and the relationship with the HCW. Then we used content analysis of responses to open-ended questions to explore the experiences of household members in-depth.

results33.8% of household members reported secondary traumatic stress within the severe range. Female spouses and partners of HCWs with clinical roles showed higher STS compared to male and other household members of HCWs with non-clinical roles. In our regression model, we found that being female, having a HCW household member with a clinical role, and being a spouse or a partner of a HCW were statistically significant predictors of high STS. Open-ended responses showed that household members reported that HCWs tended to be irritated, quieter/distant, anxious/stressed, in low moods, and exhausted after having a difficult day at work. These feelings and behaviours impacted the rest of the household members negatively.

conclusionThis is the first study which has examined secondary traumatic stress amongst household members of HCWs. While trying to support the HCW, household members were at high risk of developing secondary traumatic stress. There are research implications to understand HCWs' and their household members' experiences better, including extending current research and conducting further research exploring secondary traumatic stress in HCWs' household members, and factors associated with it, which go beyond the demographics examined here. There are also organisational and clinical implications to protect and support both HCWs and their household members, such as improved working conditions for HCWs and carefully planned psychological support for both HCWs and their household members.

Indexed as

Compassion FatigueFamilyHealth PersonnelAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultContent analysisCross-sectional studyFamily membersHealthcare workersHousehold membersMixed-method studyOccupational traumaSecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID40448215
PMCPMC12125900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.