ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Towards a national registry for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: rationale, design, and initial observations of the ABOARD cohort.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation and lessons learned regarding Public Involvement: a panel advising on an Alzheimer's disease and related dementia cohort study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Identification of patients receiving amyloid-targeting therapies in observational studies using amyloid PET trajectories: Insights from LEADS.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) take 20 to 30 years to develop, yet setting up studies or registries that take into account the entire disease trajectory is difficult and time consuming. Moreover, prediction models are often based on selected research populations and their outcomes may not be most relevant to patients' daily lives. To address these gaps we set up the ABOARD Cohort, a national data collection infrastructure to (i) study the disease trajectory using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and medical data, (ii) link to available data sources, and (iii) serve as central platform to facilitate research, roll out healthcare innovations, and accommodate nationwide disease registration. Here, we describe the design of the project and characteristics of the first 10,275 participants.
methodThe ABOARD Cohort is an ongoing, participant-centered data-collection, taking PROMs and a minimal case report form (CRF) with relevant medical data as starting point, supplemented with linkage to existing data sources. Eligible participants with or at-risk of ADRD a and their study partners are recruited directly-to-participant, i.e. without the need for a doctor to sign informed consent. Informed consent and annual collection of PROMs are fully online. Relevant stakeholders are involved in decisions on project development through a participants panel and on data usage through a data access committee.
resultsThe ABOARD Cohort has been fully operational since January 2023. As of October 2024, 10,275 participants (mean age 66.1 (9.2) years, 70% female) and 1,383 study partners signed up, and received an invitation to fill in online questionnaires and complete a digital cognitive test. Over 90% of participants gave consent to link their data to existing data sources. Participants who had consulted a doctor for memory problems (N = 1,128), reported worse outcomes on PROMs assessing mental health and cognition, quality of life and lifestyle, compared to those who had not.
conclusionThe ABOARD Cohort has been set up as a national infrastructure to study ADRD disease trajectories, linking data-sources, with the participant at the steering wheel. This infrastructure has the potential to serve as a registry to advance research and roll out healthcare innovations on a national level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.