ArticleReproductive health2025
Bridging the know-do gap: improved adolescent sexual and reproductive health and health information systems in West Africa and the Middle East.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the world approaches the final five years to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a global polycrisis threatens progress on health and well-being. Populations experiencing vulnerabilities, particularly women, girls, and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries, shoulder a disproportionate burden. Universal access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services has seen mixed progress. In particular, adolescents are facing heightened risks such as early marriage, unintended pregnancies, and limited access to SRH services, compounded by gender norms and fragile contexts. Integrated, community-driven, and gender-transformative approaches are urgently needed, as are robust health data and information systems. However, fragmented systems suffer from poor data quality and underrepresentation of marginalized groups. Digital innovations hold promise for addressing these gaps but must be adapted to local contexts. BRIDGING THE KNOW-DO GAP: This supplement presents findings from the Cedar Cohort, an initiative supported by the International Development Research Centre across West Africa and the Middle East (2017-2023). The cohort's 16 implementation research projects explored SRH services for adolescents and health information systems, emphasizing gender equality, human rights, and knowledge translation. The articles are organized around three themes: (1) adopting contextual approaches rooted in local communities and their context-specific needs, (2) advancing gender equality and inclusion and (3) harnessing the transformational potential of data and information systems. Authored by LMIC-based researchers, the supplement provides concrete findings and localized insights into the transformative change possible when high-quality research is combined with an understanding of social, economic, political, and cultural factors at the individual, organizational, structural and systems levels.
conclusionThe collection of research projects featured in this supplement enriches our understanding of designing and implementing effective initiatives to improve health outcomes for women, children and adolescents. The findings emphasize that no singular solution exists for the multifaceted SRH challenges that continue to evolve. The projects in the Cedar Cohort offer critical insights into designing and scaling SRH interventions that are locally relevant, inclusive, and impactful. The current polycrisis necessitates a re-evaluation of global strategies, and the findings from the research projects in this supplement provide indications of ways forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.