ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
A deep semi-supervised learning approach to the detection of glaucoma on out-of-distribution retinal fundus image datasets.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertuned boosting approach with Local Binary Pattern and Pivot Distribution Count method feature extractor for glaucoma identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microaneurysm segmentation under out-of-domain generalization: from diabetic retinopathy to leukemic retinopathy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Disease Detection : Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Diseases Detection.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate detection of glaucoma plays a critical role in treating the disease and can be performed on limited labeled retinal fundus images and large-scale unlabeled ones leveraging a deep semi-supervised learning (SSL) technology. This study aims to investigate how glaucoma depicted on fundus images can be reliably detected by the SSL technology and the impact of the quantities and qualities of unlabeled images on the outcome.
methodsWe retrospectively collected a dataset consisting of 7,503 fundus images and classified them into four categories, namely none, mild, moderate, or severe glaucoma. We used the collected dataset and a public out-of-distribution (OOD) dataset (EyeQ) to train an available SSL method (called SRC-MT) to grade glaucoma.
resultsSRC-MT achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8944 and 0.8969 on global field-of-view (FOV) regions and local disc regions, respectively when trained on 600 labeled images and 5401 unlabeled ones from the collected dataset. When separately introducing 16,817, 6,435, and 5,540 unlabeled OOD images with the qualities of ‘good’, ‘usable’, and ‘reject’ from the EyeQ dataset into 5,401 unlabeled images, its performance became 0.8972, 0.8908, and 0.8922, respectively for global FOV regions on the testing subset from the collected dataset, and 0.7342, 0.5090, and 0.5072 on three public datasets (i.e., AIROGS, EDDFS, and FIVES).
conclusionsSRC-MT achieved promising performance for glaucoma grading, especially in global FOV regions. Its performance increased when using more labeled images, but degraded when using more unlabeled OOD images with worse image qualities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.