Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448103›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Clinical, genetic, and sociodemographic predictors of symptom severity after internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety.

Olly Kravchenko, Julia Bäckman, David Mataix-Cols, James J Crowley, Matthew Halvorsen, Patrick F Sullivan, John Wallert, Christian Rück

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olly KravchenkoCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden. olly.kravchenko@ki.se.
Julia BäckmanCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
David Mataix-ColsCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
James J CrowleyCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Matthew HalvorsenCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick F SullivanDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
John Wallert *Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian Rück *Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Center for Innovative Medicine 954440Center for Innovative Medicine 96328Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2018-00221Stiftelsen Söderström Königska Sjukhemmet SLS-941192Vetenskapsrådet 2018-02487Vetenskapsrådet 2021-06377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) is an effective and accessible treatment for mild to moderate depression and anxiety disorders. However, up to 50% of patients do not achieve sufficient symptom relief. Identifying patient characteristics predictive of higher post-treatment symptom severity is crucial for devising personalized interventions to avoid treatment failures and reduce healthcare costs.

methodsUsing the Swedish multimodal database MULTI-PSYCH, we evaluated novel and established predictors associated with treatment outcome and assessed the added benefit of polygenic risk scores (PRS) and nationwide register data in a sample of 2668 patients treated with ICBT for major depressive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. Two linear regression models were compared: a baseline model employing six well-established predictors and a full model incorporating six clinic-based, 32 register-based predictors, and PRS for seven psychiatric disorders and traits. Predictor importance was assessed through bivariate associations, and models were compared by the variance explained in post-treatment symptom scores.

resultsOur analysis identified several novel predictors of higher post-treatment severity, including comorbid ASD and ADHD, receipt of financial benefits, and prior use of psychotropic medications. The baseline model explained 27%, while the full model accounted for 34% of the variance.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that a model incorporating a broad array of multimodal data offered a modest improvement in explanatory power compared to one using a limited set of easily accessible measures. Employing machine learning algorithms capable of capturing complex non-linear associations and interactions is a viable next step to improve prediction of post-ICBT symptom severity. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyInternet-Based InterventionMajor Depressive DisorderPanic DisorderPhobia, SocialAdultFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedMultifactorial InheritanceRegistriesSeverity of Illness IndexSwedenAnxietyCognitive behavioural therapyDepressionTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40448103
PMCPMC12125921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.