ArticleBMC health services research2025
Supporting menstrual health in homeless services: provider-informed strategies for multilevel change.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople experiencing homelessness (PEH) face heightened barriers to menstrual health, including limited access to products, hygiene facilities, and consistent care. Social service providers (SSPs) and healthcare providers (HCPs) are critical in supporting PEH but often work within resource-constrained systems. This study explores SSP and HCP perspectives on the menstrual health needs of PEH in a rural-serving community in the U.S., using the Social-Ecological Model (SEM) to identify multilevel barriers and opportunities for intervention.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 SSPs and HCPs in Tippecanoe County, Indiana. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key challenges and recommendations related to menstrual health support for PEH.
resultsOur analysis revealed complex challenges providers faced in supporting the menstrual health of PEH, including emotional burden, resource scarcity, and limited organizational guidance. They described how stigma, provider discomfort, and systemic gaps in training and infrastructure hindered effective care. Providers also shared that menstrual health was often deprioritized due to competing health needs and structural barriers such as lack of housing, transportation, and product access. Despite these challenges, providers offered actionable recommendations to improve menstrual health support through education, policy change, and more equitable organizational practices.
conclusionsThis study highlights the multi-level barriers providers face when supporting the menstrual health needs of PEH. Our findings show that meaningful change requires coordinated efforts across all levels of the SEM. Actionable strategies include provider training, improved intake processes, expanded access to menstrual products and hygiene resources, and policy reforms to address housing and insurance gaps. These insights can inform training programs, shelter protocols, and advocacy efforts to promote menstrual health equity and provider sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.