ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Implementing evidence into practice for the management of frozen shoulder: engaging with key stakeholders and evaluating barriers and facilitators using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrozen shoulder (FS) is a painful, stiff and disabling shoulder condition affecting adults of working age. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial (UK FROST) comparing three of the most common treatments provided by the National Health Service (NHS) in secondary care found all three treatments improved patient outcomes, with none being overall clinically superior. Each treatment had its advantages and disadvantages. This paper describes the use of the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) as an exemplar of knowledge translation for the latest evidence from UK FROST in the management of FS. It describes using stakeholder feedback in the development of a FS pathway, considering the barriers and facilitators to implementation in relation to the UK FROST findings and current clinical practice.
methodsHealthcare professionals, academics, policymakers and patient and public representatives were invited as stakeholders to three meetings held in November 2022 and January 2023. An overview of the United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST) study, current pathways, referral processes and guidelines for FS in the context of the study results and the development of patient resources were discussed at the first meeting in November. Outcomes from this meeting informed the January meetings. The CFIR was used to guide analysis of the discussions from the stakeholder meetings.
resultsOverall, 67 stakeholders attended across three meetings. From the meetings, we categorised the FS pathway into four components (1) presentation and assessment; (2) initial management; (3) treatment options - physiotherapy and steroid injection, secondary care referrals; and (4) enhanced recovery and follow-up, with shared decision-making emphasised throughout the pathway. Barriers and facilitators in each of the pathway components were identified using the five domains of the CFIR. A proposed evidence-based FS pathway was developed with stakeholders using an eight-step process.
conclusionsThis study has led to the development of an evidence-based FS care pathway, ready to be considered by policymakers for implementation, with considerations of barriers and facilitators. There was consensus that it is feasible to embed a modified physiotherapy intervention form UK FROST within current primary and community care settings to optimise service delivery and referral pathways. Trial Registration The trial registration is ISRCTN48804508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.