ArticleBMC cancer2025
Clinical efficacy analysis of chemotherapy of isolated neck lymphatic metastasis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Podoplanin - Related Lymphatic Micro Vessel Density Digital Analysis in Breast Adenocarcinoma.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy for neck lymph node metastasis (NLNM) by determining the characteristics and survival of patients with isolated NLNMs metastases from epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) at stage IV of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).
methodsThe clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcome of 24 cases with stage IV FIGO EOC with isolated NLNM were retrospectively analyzed between December 1, 2014, and November 30, 2021.
resultsAmong the 24 patients, 2 (8.3%) underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS), 21 (87.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), and 1 (4.2%) received chemotherapy alone. Additionally, 13 (54.2%) cases achieved abdominal R0 debulking, while 11(45.8%) cases achieved R1/R2 debulking. The chemotherapy response of NLNMs included complete response (8/24, 33.3%), partial response (15/24,62.5%), or stable disease (1/24,41.7%). None of the patients received resection or radiotherapy of NLNMs. Recurrence was observed in 15 (62.5%) patients, with only 2 experiencing recurrence of NLNMs. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35 months and 48 months, respectively. R0 debulking led to a significantly longer PFS (not reached) and OS (57 months) compared to non-R0 debulking (PFS: 10 months, P = 0.001; OS: 22 months, P = 0.001). Interestingly, patients with EOC with lymphatic recurrence had better OS ( 57 months) than did those with abdominal or distant recurrence (OS: 29 months; P = 0.012).
conclusionsChemotherapy is an effective treatment for neck lymph nodes metastasis, and a favorable response to chemotherapy could eliminate the necessity for NLNM resection or radiotherapy. Effective control of abdominal disease with surgery may be a critical factor in managing FIGO stage IV EOC patients with isolated NLMNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.