Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448047›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2025

Effectiveness of smartphone technology for detection of paediatric ocular diseases-a systematic review.

Sruthi Vijendran, Yash Alok, Neetha I R Kuzhuppilly, Jayasheela R Bhat, Yogish S Kamath

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sruthi Vijendran *Department of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Yash Alok *Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Neetha I R KuzhuppillyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Jayasheela R BhatConsultant Optometrist, Karthik Nethralaya Institute of Ophthalmology Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, 560050, India.
Yogish S KamathDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. yogish.kamath@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence has become part of healthcare with a multitude of applications being customized to roles required in clinical practice. There has been an expanding growth and development of computer technology with increasing appearance in the ophthalmological universe with roles in detection of most ophthalmic diseases. This article attempts to study the efficacy of smartphones and their applications in detection of paediatric eye diseases.

methodsOn 24 January 2024, a comprehensive search was performed across five databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and ProQuest-focusing on studies assessing smartphone-based disease detection and diagnostic accuracy compared to validated methods. Keywords and MeSH terms, including "smartphone," "eye diseases," and "children," were combined using Boolean operators and eligible studies were obtained. The inclusion criteria covered studies from 2000 to 2023, involving children under 18 years, and reporting diagnostic outcomes. Exclusions included studies not exclusive to eye disease, purely adult population studies, reviews, studies with non-availability of full text, and studies exploring other uses of smartphone and designs lacking diagnostic efficacy analysis. Article quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist.

resultsA total of 2054 articles were retrieved. After removing 1112 duplicates, 507 records were excluded through title screening, followed by 333 through abstract screening. A full-text review of 83 articles led to the inclusion of 33 studies, involving 16,015 participants. Most of the studies (28, 84.84%) were of high quality, with five (15.15%) of moderate quality. Twelve smartphone applications assessed refractive errors using visual acuity tests or photorefraction, five detected amblyogenic risk factors, six identified strabismus, and three targeted leukocoria. Additional applications evaluated stereoacuity (two), eyelid position (one), chalazion (one), corneal diameter (one), and retinopathy of prematurity (two). Overall, these applications demonstrated the potential of smartphones in paediatric eye disease detection.

conclusionSmartphone applications are effective tools for detecting important causes of childhood eye disorders such as strabismus, retinopathy of prematurity, chalazion, and refractive errors. These technologies offer promising opportunities for teleophthalmology and integration into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalEye DiseasesSmartphoneArtificial IntelligenceChildHumansChildEye diseasesMobile applicationsPaediatricSmartphoneVisual disorders

Identifiers

PMID40448047
PMCPMC12123870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.