ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Influencing factors of the implementation of mechanical restraint in open psychiatric ward: a retrospective study (2016-2021).
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical restraint, a widely utilized yet contentious restrictive intervention in psychiatric practice, adversely affects both physical and psychological well-being of patients. Understanding the determinants associated with its implementation is crucial for reducing its clinical application. Current studies have primarily evaluated factors influencing mechanical restraint use and related organizational adaptations, but these investigations are limited to short-term observations. Furthermore, research examining correlates in patients subjected to recurrent mechanical restraint episodes in open psychiatric wards remains scarce, with biological contributing factors particularly lacking empirical evidence.
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze differences between inpatients experiencing single versus multiple restraint episodes in the open psychiatric ward setting and identify factors associated with multiple restraint occurrences.
methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data from patients who underwent mechanical restraint in the open psychiatric ward of a Class III Grade A general hospital in China between 2016 and 2021. The data encompassed sociodemographic information, clinical characteristics, and biological indicators.
resultsThe study included a total of 449 patients who underwent mechanical restraint during hospitalization. Of these, 63.5% experienced a single episode of restraint, while 36.5% experienced multiple episodes. Furthermore, compared to patients with a single episode of mechanical restraint, those with multiple episodes exhibited a significantly earlier timing of the first restraint (p = 0.011), a prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.044), and relatively higher creatine kinase levels (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis identified the timing of restraint (OR: 0.947, p = 0.005) and the duration of hospitalization (OR: 1.034, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of multiple restraint episodes.
conclusionAmong psychiatric inpatients in open wards, those subjected to multiple restraints exhibited earlier occurrence of the first restraint after admission, prolonged hospital stays, and relatively higher serum creatine kinase levels at admission. These findings suggest that in clinical practice, repeated restraint may potentially prolong hospitalization duration. Monitoring serum creatine kinase levels at admission may aid in identifying patients at risk for repeated restraints. Furthermore, early risk identification and the implementation of alternative interventions are critical to reducing the necessity for restraint interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.