ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Multi-spatial-attention U-Net: a novel framework for automated gallbladder segmentation on CT images.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to construct a novel model, Multi-Spatial Attention U-Net (MSAU-Net) by incorporating our proposed Multi-Spatial Attention (MSA) block into the U-Net for the automated segmentation of the gallbladder on CT images.
methodsThe gallbladder dataset consists of CT images of retrospectively-collected 152 liver cancer patients and corresponding ground truth delineated by experienced physicians. Our proposed MSAU-Net model was transformed into two versions V1(with one Multi-Scale Feature Extraction and Fusion (MSFEF) module in each MSA block) and V2 (with two parallel MSEFE modules in each MSA blcok). The performances of V1 and V2 were evaluated and compared with four other derivatives of U-Net or state-of-the-art models quantitatively using seven commonly-used metrics, and qualitatively by comparison against experienced physicians' assessment.
resultsMSAU-Net V1 and V2 models both outperformed the comparative models across most quantitative metrics with better segmentation accuracy and boundary delineation. The optimal number of MSA was three for V1 and two for V2. Qualitative evaluations confirmed that they produced results closer to physicians' annotations. External validation revealed that MSAU-Net V2 exhibited better generalization capability.
conclusionThe MSAU-Net V1 and V2 both exhibited outstanding performance in gallbladder segmentation, demonstrating strong potential for clinical application. The MSA block enhances spatial information capture, improving the model's ability to segment small and complex structures with greater precision. These advantages position the MSAU-Net V1 and V2 as valuable tools for broader clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.