Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447943›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Evaluating the role of consolidative chest radiotherapy after chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Jorge Raul Vazquez-Urrutia, Natasha Venugopal, Junjia Zhu, Joseph A Miccio, Mitchell Machtay, Takefumi Komiya

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge Raul Vazquez-UrrutiaDepartment of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Natasha VenugopalDepartment of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Junjia ZhuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Joseph A MiccioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Mitchell MachtayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Takefumi KomiyaDivision of Hematology Oncology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. tkomiya@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsolidative chest radiotherapy (XRT) after chemoimmunotherapy may provide benefits in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) due to the condition's high sensitivity to radiation. Current guidelines suggest chest XRT for patients with ES-SCLC who respond to chemotherapy, given its association with improved 2-year overall survival (OS), and reduced progression and recurrence rates. However, its role in the era of chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC remains unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed (n = 24,676). Cases included those treated with multi-agent chemotherapy, with data for T, N, and M status, and chest XRT. Exclusion criteria included survival < 30 days, limited-stage SCLC cases, and missing key data elements. The primary outcome was OS from diagnosis, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Methods and multi-variable Cox regression models. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed to compare outcomes in ES-SCLC patients receiving chest XRT after immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone, adjusting for T, N, and M status, institution, sex, and Charlson-Deyo score. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe study stratified patients in two stratums: 10,437 patients who received immunotherapy and 14,239 who did not receive immunotherapy. The proportion of chest XRT receivers was similar across both stratum (13% vs. 14%, p = 0.17). Receipt of XRT was significantly associated with younger age (< 70), female sex, T3-4 stage, N2-N3, and M1a status; (p < 0.05). Chest XRT was associated with significantly increased median OS in both stratum: immunotherapy (13.1 months vs. 9.8 months; p < 0.001) and non-immunotherapy (11.6 months vs. 8.4 months; p < 0.001). XRT was an independent predictor of better OS in both stratum after controlling for selected covariates (HR 0.72 and 0.67; p < 0.001). PSM analysis of 1,399 patients receiving XRT and immunotherapy and 1,399 receiving immunotherapy alone confirmed that XRT after immunotherapy was associated with improved OS (13.1 months vs. 9.4 months; HR 0.63, p < 0.001) with a 3-year survival of 16% (95%CI 13.7-18.3%) vs 7% (95% CI 5.3-8.7%), respectively.

conclusionOur analysis shows that consolidative chest XRT is associated with improved overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC in patients receiving immunotherapy. These findings are hypothesis-generating and support ongoing randomized studies evaluating consolidative radiotherapy in the chemoimmunotherapy era.

Indexed as

Chemo-immunotherapyChest radiationExtensive stageSmall cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID40447943
PMCPMC12125409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.