ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Beyond the Guinea Pig Myth: Understanding Complex Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials Participation in a Community Clinic.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and Caregiver Reported Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: A Scoping Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40447868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.