ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Feasibility and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After a Manchester Procedure.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Commentary on "Feasibility and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After A Manchester Procedure".International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith the implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach, the duration of hospital admission after vaginal prolapse surgery is reduced. In this study, we determined the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge in patients undergoing a Manchester procedure by comparing same-day discharge to overnight admission.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. During the period 2019-2023, all patients undergoing a Manchester procedure planned with overnight admission (group A) were compared to patients undergoing this surgery which was planned with same-day discharge (group B). The need for readmission and rate of prolonged hospitalization and complications were compared.
resultsThis study included 213 patients; 103 in group A and 110 in group B. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The rate of readmission in both groups was similar (10.7% vs 15.5%; p = 0.183). No differences were found regarding complications such as discharge with prolonged catheterization due to urinary retention (15.5% vs 11.8%; p = 0.483).
conclusionPerforming the Manchester procedure with same-day discharge is safe and should be implemented as an important element of the ERAS approach. Same-day discharge further reduces length of hospital stay and could reduce costs, while promoting early patient mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40447866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.