ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Geriatric 8 score as a prognostic factor of the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The geriatric 8 score as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOxaliplatin (L-OHP) is effective in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, given concerns about the possible impact of L-OHP-based chemotherapy regimens in the face of physical functional decline, the question of whether they should be actively recommended for elderly patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the relationship between the Geriatric 8 (G8) score, which assesses overall function in the elderly, and the efficacy and safety of L-OHP-based chemotherapy regimens.
methodsThis retrospective study included mCRC patients aged ≥ 70 years who received L-OHP as first-line therapy between January 2017 and December 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was incidence of adverse events (Grade ≥ 2). Patients were classified into high (≥ 14 points) and low (< 14 points) G8 score groups for comparison.
resultsA total of 55 patients were included. Median PFS was significantly longer in the high G8 score group compared to the low G8 score group (12.4 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.034). No significant difference in OS was observed (27.9 vs. 29.8 months, P = 0.833). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, but nausea incidence tended to be higher in the low G8 score group (0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.096).
conclusionThe G8 score may serve as a useful prognostic factor in elderly mCRC patients receiving L-OHP. Those with lower G8 scores may be at higher risk of L-OHP-induced nausea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.