ArticleScientific reports2025
CD9, a novel potential biomarker of sarcopenia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomics of aging: biomarkers for physiological systems and diseases.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness for sarcopenia in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Association between chronic kidney disease and sarcopenia and emerging treatment strategies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- A review of omics studies in sarcopenia: from molecular mechanisms to hepatic-gut-muscle interactions in chronic liver disease comorbidity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sarcopenia is defined as a progressive decrease in skeletal muscle mass and strength due to ageing, and is associated with adverse outcomes such as falls, fractures, and physical disability, leading to increased healthcare expenditures and mortality risks. Although sarcopenia has recently become a major challenge, there are currently no effective interventions or drugs marketed for sarcopenia. Therefore, new biomarkers for early diagnosis and targeted drugs for the treatment of sarcopenia are urgently needed. In the present research, transcriptomics and proteomics analyses were combined and experiments at the transcriptional and protein levels were conducted to identify key genes and molecular mechanisms underlying sarcopenia in senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 (SAM-P8) mice, followed by molecular docking to predict targeted drugs. The combined omics analysis identified 8 key genes, while the experiments verified that only CD9 significantly decreased in sarcopenia. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) results suggested that CD9 involved in ATP biosynthesis, mitochondrial biogenesis, and oxidative phosphorylation. Besides, dapoxetine, levomilnacipran, and milnacipran were predicted to target CD9 through molecular docking. Our study reported for the first time that CD9 is a novel potential biomarker of sarcopenia, and targeting CD9 may be a new idea for the development of therapeutic drugs for sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.