Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447795›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Auricular cartilage flap for device salvage in revision cochlear implant surgery.

Emirhan Ceviken, Serdal Celik, Merve Torun Topcu, Mahmut Tayyar Kalcioglu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emirhan CevikenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Serdal CelikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Merve Torun TopcuDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mahmut Tayyar KalciogluDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Türkiye. mtkalcioglu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-5467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the number of cochlear implant surgeries performed to restore hearing in people with hearing loss is increasing with the expansion of indications, the likelihood of complications and revision surgeries is decreasing proportionally as surgical techniques and device technology have evolved over the years. In this case, a cartilage-reinforced flap approach was used to solve the problem of a patient whose implant electrode became visible under the skin five years after the initial surgery. Since it was not possible to replace the implant during revision surgery due to financial reasons, this surgical approach was preferred to preserve the device. In certain situations it may be necessary to develop solutions outside of established protocols. In this case, while the standard approach would be to remove the implant, create a new implant bed and perform a revision surgery with a new implant, the patient's inability to obtain a new device necessitated the preservation of the existing implant. This approach successfully resolved the problem and prevented the patient from losing access to sound.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsEar CartilageSurgical FlapsHumansReoperationCartilage-reinforced flapCochlear implantRevision

Identifiers

PMID40447795
PMCPMC12518448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.