ArticleScientific reports2025
The magnitude of sagittal head posture displacement and patient demographics predict rehabilitation outcomes in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A multicenter, prospective consecutive case series study was conducted in 5 physiotherapy clinics in the UAE from January 2021 to March 2023 to assess rotations and translations of head posture parameters as potential predictors of conservative therapy outcomes in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). Eighty-six patients (mean age 35 yrs., 65% male) with CNSNP underwent conservative therapy. All participants received a detailed examination including a computerized cervical spine posture analysis and demographic data was collected. Interventions included specific exercises, diathermy, longitudinal traction, education, a detailed exercise program, ergonomic advice, and medications. Interventions were applied 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Follow-up was 6-months after final treatment. A successful outcome was based on a minimum improvement of the following four outcomes using the patient centered outcome questionnaire (PCOQ): (1) reduction of pain by 17.5 points (0-100 NRS); (2) fatigue reduction by 7.5 points; (3) distress reduction by 5 points; and (4) interference reduction by 9.5 points. At 6-month follow-up it was found that success rates for pain, fatigue, distress, and interference were above 60% for the total participants. The logistic regression for predicting overall success in combined outcomes based on age, gender, smoking status, marital status, and sagittal head translation was: (1) Age: the odds ratio (0.69) suggests that as age increases, the likelihood of overall success decreases (p = 0.001); (2) Sex: females have higher odds of overall success compared to males (OR = 2.71, p < 0.001); (3) Smoking status and marital status: neither of these factors were statistically significant predictors of overall success; (4) Sagittal head translation: each unit increase (more anterior) in this abnormal posture reduced the odds of success by 13%, showing a strong and significant effect (OR = 0.13, p < 0.001). Overall, our findings indicate that younger age, female sex, and less sagittal head translation all had a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of success of 6-month outcomes in patients suffering CNSNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.