ArticleScientific reports2025
A bearing fault diagnosis method for hydrodynamic transmissions integrating few-shot learning and transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the insufficient generalization capability of bearing fault diagnosis models caused by scarce vibration data from high-power hydrodynamic transmission testbeds, this study proposes a diagnostic method integrating deep few-shot learning with transfer learning. First, a Siamese Wide Convolutional Neural Network (Siamese-WDCNN) is constructed based on public bearing datasets to extract essential features of vibration signals through few-shot contrastive learning. Second, we introduce a transfer learning strategy to address cross-condition generalization challenges. This approach adapts pre-trained model parameters from the CWRU dataset to real industrial hydrodynamic transmission data. We then fine-tune the model using limited target-domain samples to optimize performance. Experiments evaluating the generalization capability under variable operating conditions compare diagnostic performance across SVM, WDCNN, WDCNN + TL, FSL + TL, and FSL + TL + AM methods. Results demonstrate that FSL + TL achieves an accuracy of 85.30% under mixed operating conditions. Further optimization by incorporating an attention mechanism (FSL + TL + AM) elevates accuracy to 88.75%, effectively enhancing the generalization capability of the bearing fault diagnosis model. This validates the engineering practicality of the proposed method and explores a viable pathway for industrial equipment health monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.