ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel war strategy optimization algorithm based maximum power point tracking method for PV systems under partial shading conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced maximum power point tracking using hippopotamus optimization algorithm for grid-connected photovoltaic system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solar energy systems are well known for their eco-nature and cost-effectiveness as they gain more traction with lower installation expenses and enhanced efficiency levels over time. Traditional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods perform effectively in uniform irradiance conditions but encounter difficulties in identifying global maximum power points (GMPP) during partial shading conditions (PSCs). Although various advanced methods exist to tackle this challenge such as metaheuristic approaches it is evident that there is potential for further enhancement, in accelerating the convergence process towards the GMPP. This study presents an approach for maximizing power point tracking (MPPT) using enhanced War Strategy Optimization (WSO) which imitates the tactical movements of military forces in combat situations. The optimization procedure imitates battlefield tactics by having soldiers adapt their positions in time to reach an optimal outcome. Two primary war tactics attack and defensive are simulated within this model. To improve the effectiveness and resilience of the algorithm. Furthermore, this paper introduces an enhanced WSO algorithm designed for the MPPT task under partial shading conditions (PSC), incorporating several novel features such as adaptive rank-based weight updating, strategic soldier relocation, and a dual-mode attack-defense strategies. The effectiveness of the WSO algorithm was tested with more than 25 benchmark functions, demonstrating significant improvements in performance compared to well-known metaheuristic algorithms from the existing literature. Th proposed WSO algorithm seems to find a middle ground between exploring and exploiting PSC based photovoltaic systems. The simulation and experimental results show that it outperforms advanced MPPT techniques. In contrast to AI-based MPPT methods, the proposed WSO demonstrates faster tracking speed, improved dynamic response, higher static and dynamic tracking efficiency, better power tracking, and greater accuracy, even in complex scenarios involving multiple shaded areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.