ArticleScientific reports2025
Contamination of fabric surface by the particles woven from the cotton waste open end rotor yarn.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigated and analyzed the contamination of the fabric surface due to cotton waste yarn woven into the weft. The impact of cotton waste proportion and cleaning methods on open-end rotor yarn quality, using blends from 100 to 0% cotton waste mixed with virgin cotton fibers were investigated. The study proves that cotton waste can be effectively incorporated into yarn production without significantly compromising fabric properties, supporting the sustainable use of recycled fibers. The innovative cleaning channel W increases fiber yield but also raises contamination levels, leading to a higher number of detected impurities on the fabric surface. The classification method for dust and trash particles significantly affects the contamination evaluation, though contamination trends remain consistent. The classification of dust and trash particles by the maximal Ferret's diameter is preferred based on the obtained outputs from the realized experiment. Additionally, while the size of dust particles decreases as the cotton waste proportion decreases, trash particle size is unaffected by the cleaning channel or waste ratio in the weft yarn. In the case of the binary portion, contaminant levels decrease as cotton waste content in weft yarns is reduced, with the lowest found in cleaning channel A, followed by C and W. Surprisingly, dust and trash particles contribute to the binary portion equally. It leads to the recommendation connected with optimizing fabric quality, the final treatment should focus mainly on eliminating the visual impact of larger contaminants. The reason is that smaller particles can be mostly removed during pretreatment because they are not firmly fixed in a woven structure. The results also highlight the link between fabric contamination and potential health risks from respirable dust particles in the workplace, underscoring the need for effective control during processing to protect workers and ensure stable production not only in weaving but also in the following processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.