Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An immunohistochemistry-based classification of colorectal cancer resembling the consensus molecular subtypes using convolutional neural networks.

Tuomas Kaprio, Jaana Hagström, Jussi Kasurinen, Ioannis Gkekas, Sofia Edin, Ines Beilmann-Lehtonen, Karin Strigård, Richard Palmqvist, Ulf Gunnarson, Camilla Böckelman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tuomas KaprioDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu, 00290, Helsinki, Finland. tuomas.kaprio@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-9975
Jaana HagströmDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi KasurinenDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ioannis GkekasDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sofia EdinDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ines Beilmann-LehtonenDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Karin StrigårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Richard PalmqvistDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ulf GunnarsonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Camilla BöckelmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Caj HaglundDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a major global disease burden with nearly 1 million cancer-related deaths annually. TNM staging has served as the foundation for predicting patient prognosis, despite variation across staging groups. The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) is a transcriptome-based system classifying CRC tumors into four subtypes with different characteristics: CMS1 (immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal). Transcriptomics is too complex and expensive for clinical implementation; therefore, an immunohistochemical method is needed. The prognostic impact of the immunohistochemistry-based four CMS-like subtypes remains unclear. Due to the complexity and costs associated with transcriptomics, we developed an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based method supported by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to define subgroups that resemble CMS biological characteristics. Building on previous IHC-classifiers and incorporating β-catenin to refine differentiation between CMS2- and CMS3-like profiles, we categorized CRC tumors in a cohort of 538 patients. Classification was successful in 89.4% and 15.9% of tumors were classified as CMS1-like, 35.1% as CMS2-like, 38.7% as CMS3-like, and 11.7% as CMS4-like. CMS2-like patients exhibited the best overall survival (p = 0.018), including when local and metastasized disease were analyzed separately. Our method offers an accessible and clinically feasible CMS-inspired classification, although it does not serve as a replacement for transcriptomic CMS classification.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsImmunohistochemistryNeural Networks, ComputerAgedBiomarkers, TumorConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorColorectal cancerConsensus molecular subtypesConvoluted neural networkImmunohistochemistryPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40447758
PMCPMC12125322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.