ArticleScientific reports2025
Uncertainty evaluation and model optimization in multi-source reservoir modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incompleteness of data and the variability in research methodologies can lead to significant uncertainties in reservoir modeling predictions. Effectively reducing and assessing these uncertainties are central issues in reservoir modeling studies. This research takes the ultra-low permeability and ultra-low porosity conglomeratic sandstone oil reservoir in the Yong 935-936 block of the Dongying Depression as a case study to conduct a survey on uncertainty modeling and evaluating. Considering the presence of multiple sediment sources in the study area, a variogram model with local variable azimuth angles is designed to address the discontinuity of sand bodies at the partition boundaries during modeling. Geological insights are used to delineate the boundaries of fan bodies, and statistical analysis of the proportions of sandstone and mudstone under different effective reservoir property limits within these fan bodies provides conditional data to reduce uncertainties in the modeling process. A full-factor experiment is conducted to perform a sensitivity analysis on parameters influencing reserves calculations, clarifying the significance of various influencing factors, such as fan body boundaries, effective reservoir property thresholds, and variogram range. A multivariate regression model between reserves calculation and significant influencing factors is constructed through response surface experiments. Finally, combining the Monte Carlo random simulation method, the distribution of cumulative probability reserves is obtained, and the 3P reserves of the study area are predicted to test the effectiveness of the multivariate regression model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.