Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447745›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

FARES and Spaso method for anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective randomized control study demonstrating the benefit of a combined approach.

Kun-Han Lee, Shu-Hao Chang, Li-Wei Hung

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01979237 (Comparing FARES Method With SPASO Method for Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01979237 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparing FARES Method With SPASO Method for Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: a Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2013Enrolled100ConditionsShoulder Anterior DislocationArmsSPASO method and FARES method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kun-Han LeeDepartment of Orthopedics, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Hao ChangDepartment of Orthopedics, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Li-Wei HungDepartment of Orthopedics, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. hung.liwei@gmail.com.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST111-2221-E-341-002Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital 2024SKHADR023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior shoulder dislocation is a common orthopedic emergency. While many reduction methods require sedation, the FARES (FAst, REliable, and Safe) and Spaso methods allow reduction without anesthesia. We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the FARES and Spaso methods for anterior shoulder dislocation reduction. Patients aged 20 to 90 years were enrolled. The assigned closed reduction procedures were performed without patient sedation by trained orthopedic residents. If two attempts with the assigned method failed, the alternative method was used. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, while secondary outcomes included overall success rate with both methods, reduction time, and pain scores. During November 2013 and December 2015, a total of 32 patients were randomized to the FARES (n = 17) or Spaso (n = 15) method. The first-attempt success rates were 71.6% for the FARES group and 80.0% for the Spaso group (p = 0.691). Among patients with failed closed reduction using the first technique, all patients in the Spaso-following-FARES group achieved successful reduction, whereas none in the FARES-following-Spaso group achieved successful reduction (p = 0.092). Pain scores during reduction were comparable between the FARES (4.29 ± 1.69) and Spaso (3.80 ± 2.65) techniques, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.542). Follow-up data were available for 28/32 patients (87.5%; mean 5.3 ± 2.2 years). Four patients were lost (3 FARES, 1 Spaso; p = 0.726). Recurrent dislocation occurred in 3 patients (10.7%; 1 FARES, 2 Spaso; p = 0.947), and 2 patients (1 per group; p = 0.876) underwent surgery (arthroscopic stabilization and rotator cuff repair). Both the FARES and Spaso methods were effective for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations. Combining these methods may improve overall reduction rates. Clinical trial registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT01979237) on 08/11/2013.

Indexed as

Manipulation, OrthopedicShoulder DislocationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnterior shoulder dislocationClosed reductionFARES methodNon-sedation reductionSpaso method

Identifiers

PMID40447745
PMCPMC12125210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.