Trial reportScientific reports2025
Improved aerobic capacity in a randomized controlled trial of noncombustible nicotine and tobacco products.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiorespiratory fitness in working adults undergoing rehabilitation: the role of lifestyle and body composition- a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Heated Tobacco Products: Emerging Health Outcomes and Insights into Oxidative Stress and Pro-Inflammatory-Driving Mechanisms.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smoking negatively impacts aerobic capacity, primarily by reducing V̇O2max, the gold standard measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. While smoking cessation is known to improve vascular function, exercise performance, and oxygen uptake, its specific impact on V̇O2max remains underexplored. Specifically, no research has yet evaluated V̇O2max changes following a switch to electronic cigarettes (ECs) or heated tobacco products (HTPs). This is a secondary analysis of the CEASEFIRE trial, a 12-weeks randomized controlled switching trial comparing the impact of ECs or HTPs on changes in smoking behaviour. The trial offers a unique opportunity to prospectively examine the relationship between smoking behavior and aerobic capacity, and to examine-for the first time-the specific impact of exclusive EC or HTP use on V̇O2max. Changes in VO₂max were analized across three smoking phenotypes: continuous smokers, those who reduced smoking, and those who abstained from smoking Additionally, VO2max was also evaluated specifically in participants who completely abstained from smoking tobacco cigarettes, evaluating outcomes in exclusive EC and HTP users. Quitters showed the greatest improvement in VO2max at both week 4 (2.4 ± 1.7 mL kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.