ArticleScientific reports2025
Tailored treatment of specific diagnosis improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with myocardial Ischemia and Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Flow Reserve in Adults: Pathophysiology, Assessment Modalities, Clinical Applications, and Prognostic Significance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coronary computed tomography angiography adipose tissue attenuation in diabetic patients with myocardial ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries.World journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnosis, treatments, and the amplifying potential of sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- From Intracoronary Physiology to Endotype-Based Treatment: Quality of Life Improvement for INOCA Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Bridging the Diagnosis-Treatment Divide in Women with INOCA-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) represents a challenging clinical scenario affecting a considerable proportion of patients undergoing coronary angiography. INOCA manifests with various pathomechanisms, including abnormalities in coronary microvessels and vasomotor disorders. INOCA patients experience substantial symptoms and heightened risk of adverse cardiac events. Guidelines outline diagnostic and treatment strategies, emphasizing tailored approaches for improved outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate symptoms and quality of life changes in INOCA patients following tailored treatment based on comprehensive diagnostic assessment of the coronary circulation. This is a single-center prospective registry of symptomatic adult patients diagnosed with INOCA. Comprehensive invasive physiological diagnostics including assessment of coronary microcirculation function and coronary artery reactivity were conducted. Clinical outcomes, angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Scale), and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) were assessed at baseline and after 12 months of tailored anti-angina treatment based on pathophysiological background. A total of 150 patients were enrolled. At baseline 8% of patients had angina CCS I, 70% CCS II and 22% CCS III. After 12 months 46% had no angina symptoms, 22% had angina CCS I, 26% CCS II and 6% CCS III. Following tailored treatment, angina severity significantly decreased (p < 0.001). The quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) was significantly better after 12 months compared to baseline (66 [45; 103] vs. 91 [69; 115] points; P < 0.001). In this observational study, a proposed care pathway for patients with INOCA was presented. Despite the observational nature of the study, both symptoms and quality of life improved, underscoring the need for future prospective randomized controlled trials. Further research, including adequately powered sample sizes of patients is warranted to evaluate the influence of pathophysiology-tailored treatment of INOCA on long-term major cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.