ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pathogen detection for lower respiratory tract infections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA sequencing for microbial surveillance in cystic fibrosis airways: advances, challenges, and clinical translation.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Cross-Compartment Virome Profiling in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Substance Use Disorder Reveals Brain-CSF-Periphery Discordance and Hepatitis B Virus in Central Nervous System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Spinal Tuberculosis Diagnosed by Metagenomics Capture (MetaCAP) in a Patient Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected pulmonary infections: a comparative study stratified by immune status.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Differentiating tuberculous pleurisy from pulmonary tuberculosis using mNGS: a multicenter cohort analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Next-generation sequencing in the etiological diagnosis of severe childhood pneumonia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Severe empyema caused by mixed oral anaerobic bacterial infection: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis: a retrospective comparative clinical performance study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infectious Diseases: Clinical Applications, Translational Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of metagenomic sequencing on clinical outcomes in patients with suspected central nervous system infections: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of non-invasive diagnostic tests forFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Impact of Antibiotic Exposure Duration on Pathogen Detection in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Tri-layer microbiology for LMIC Hospitals: linking syndromic panels with reflex culture and targeted sequencing for real world care - a narrative review.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying pathogens in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) has always been a major challenge. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology is a new diagnostic tool that can assist clinicians in the etiological diagnosis of LRTIs. This study focuses on the clinical value of mNGS in the diagnosis of suspected LRTIs. A total of 400 patients with suspected LRTIs admitted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from July 2020 to February 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were analyzed using both mNGS and culture methods. The diagnostic accuracy of two approaches was systematically compared against the final clinical diagnosis, which served as the gold-standard reference. Of the 400 enrolled cases, 82.3% (329/400) were diagnosed with LRTIs. From these cases, mNGS identified 76.8% (307/400) truepositive cases, 8.0% (32/400) falsepositive cases, 9.8% (39/400) truenegative cases, and 5.5% (22/400) falsenegative cases. mNGS demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity [93.3% (307/329) vs. 55.6(183/329)%] alongside greater negative predictive values [63.9% (39/61) vs.25.9%(51/197)], whereas culture offered higher specificity [54.9%(39/71) vs. 71.8%(51/71)]. The area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of mNGS[0.744(95%CI: 0.67-0.82)]was significantly higher than that of cultures[0.636(95%CI: 0.57-0.71)]. Specifically, mNGS detected more Streptococcus pneumoniae (7.0% vs. 0%), Haemophilus influenzae (6.7% vs. 0%), Aspergillus (9.4% vs. 3.5%), Pneumocystis jirovecii (11.9% vs. 0%) and other intracellular pathogens. Of the 329 patients with LRTIs, antibiotic treatment was modified based on the mNGS results in more than half of the patients(50.5%,166/329), including 20 cases of adjusted antimicrobial regimens, 70 cases de-escalated the empirical antibiotic treatment, and 76 patients escalated the treatment by increasing dosage or medication. 60.8%(101/166) of patients responded to modified antibiotic treatment. Significant benefits of mNGS have been shown in pathogen identification and antimicrobial treatment stewardship in patients with LRTIs. For those with suboptimal therapeutic responses, physicians should be alert to some emerging intracellular pathogens, including Chlamydia psittaci, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Pneumocystis jirovecii.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.