ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on mining deformation and fracture response mechanism and rock pressure law of super thick composite key roof.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to study the movement and deformation law of the super thick composite key layer overlying the stope. Taking the geological conditions of Yima mining area as the background, a three-dimensional (3.6 m × 2.0 m × 2.0 m) three-dimensional model was built for testing, and the deformation of overlying rock was monitored in real time by using distributed optical fiber, pressure sensor and multi-point displacement meter. The results show that the changes of the frequency shift peak value of the sensing fiber in value, position and shape reflect the dynamic evolution process of the bending deformation, fracture and rotation of the key strata in the overburden. When the working face advanced to 960 m, the 40 m thick fine sandstone (sub key layer I) broke four times and was in the collapse zone; The 160 m thick conglomerate (sub key layer II) of the lower formation was broken once, but the structure was not unstable and was in the fracture zone; The 250 m thick super thick conglomerate (the main key layer) of the upper formation has slight bending deformation and is located in the bending subsidence zone. The influence of mining causes the overlying high-level giant thick conglomerate to show two deformation characteristics: the giant thick conglomerate under the sub key layer forms a number of short-distance longitudinal non-through fractures, and the giant thick conglomerate above the main key layer forms a large non-through fracture bending deformation in the horizontal layer. With the increase of mining range, the composite key layer will appear synchronous and asynchronous fracture, and the rock layer will be suspended in a large area, which is easy to induce mine dynamic disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.