Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447686›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The basal area explains the abundance of stone tool sites reused by blonde capuchin monkeys.

Maria Gabriella Rufino, João Pedro Souza-Alves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Gabriella RufinoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil. mariagabirufino@gmail.com.
João Pedro Souza-AlvesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural adaptability in primates is widely known. However, the role of local landscape metrics on the use of stone tool sites remains poorly understood. Therefore, we tested whether the distance from water sources, the availability of edible nuts and stones on the ground, and the density and basal area of the trees can influence the abundance of stone tool sites reused by blonde capuchin monkeys. A total of 238 trees were measured in the area. The area exhibited a density of 793.33 individuals/ha and a base area of 20.54 m

Indexed as

CebusFeeding BehaviorTool Use BehaviorAnimalsEcosystemMaleNutsTreesAdaptabilityBehavioural ecologyCaatingaLocal landscape metricsSapajus flavius

Identifiers

PMID40447686
PMCPMC12125338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.