ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-driven automated mitochondrial segmentation for analysis of complex transmission electron microscopy images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell Structure Segmentation in TEM Images of Murine Skin Melanoma Cells by Deep Learning Model.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- WeakMitoSAM: competitive prompt aggregation for point-supervised mitochondria segmentation in electron microscopy images.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- From Microscopy to Nanoscopy: Contemporary Physical Methods in Mitochondrial Structural Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitochondria are central to cellular energy production and regulation, with their morphology tightly linked to functional performance. Precise analysis of mitochondrial ultrastructure is crucial for understanding cellular bioenergetics and pathology. While transmission electron microscopy (TEM) remains the gold standard for such analyses, traditional manual segmentation methods are time-consuming and prone to error. In this study, we introduce a novel deep learning framework that combines probabilistic interactive segmentation with automated quantification of mitochondrial morphology. Leveraging uncertainty analysis and real-time user feedback, the model achieves comparable segmentation accuracy while reducing analysis time by 90% compared to manual methods. Evaluated on both benchmark Lucchi++ datasets and real-world TEM images of mouse skeletal muscle, the pipeline not only improved efficiency but also identified key pathological differences in mitochondrial morphology between wild-type and mdx mouse models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This automated approach offers a powerful, scalable tool for mitochondrial analysis, enabling high-throughput and reproducible insights into cellular function and disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.