ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence of environmental tobacco smoke by industry in central America: findings from the II central American survey of working conditions and health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure remains a preventable cause of illness and death worldwide. Tobacco smoke bans reduce exposure, but enforcement in Central America has been slow. Workplaces can reduce ETS impact through policies. This study assessed ETS exposure across various industries in Central America. Data were drawn from II Central American Working Conditions and Health Survey administered between February and June of 2018. The prevalence of ETS and 95% CIs were calculated. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations of exposure to ETS with industry, socio-demographics, and working conditions. Among the 9,032 workers studied, 61.3% were male, 43.8% were aged 25-45, and 32.4% worked in agriculture. ETS exposure was highest in the transportation industry (40.1%) and lowest in education/healthcare (11.5%). Males (OR = 1.33; 95%CI: 1.01-1.76), workers with high psychological demands (OR = 1.92; 95%CI: 1.49-2.47), and current smokers (OR = 4.46; 95%CI: 3.27-6.08) had higher odds of ETS exposure. Exposure to ETS in Central American workplaces remains high, varying by industry. Despite policy changes in the region, the high ETS exposure indicates weak enforcement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.