ArticleScientific reports2025
Inflammatory factors released by ACL reconstruction tendon grafts and their potential for macrophage polarization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep oscillation therapy enhances early rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Trial
- Biologic Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Beyond: A Review of PRP and BMAC.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture requires reconstruction (ACLR), often using tendon autografts, to restore joint stability. However, postoperative issues persist, especially in younger patients, with the primary cause still unclear. These issues are believed to result from a detrimental in vivo remodeling response, characterized by macrophage-involving inflammation that is driven by dead and dying graft resident cells. This research aimed to (1) analyze factors secreted by different tendon grafts, (2) investigate how these factors influence macrophage polarization, and (3) explore the influence of patients' age on these secreted factors. An ex vivo set-up was used to provide new insights into the role of tendon grafts in the inflammatory response observed after ACLR in a patient-specific way. It was found that the dying cells in fresh autografts released a mixture of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. This release was reduced in grafts where the cells were already dead (frozen) or in grafts from which the cells were removed (decellularized). The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by fresh grafts may contribute to the inflammatory response after ACLR. However, secreted factors did not polarize (THP-1) macrophages in our in vitro setup. A key finding of this study was the observed patient-specific response, which was not age-related in the used cohort, which emphasizes the need for personalized rehabilitation. In the future, correlating these findings with clinical patients' outcomes can enhance understanding of patient-specific recovery and aid in finding a biomarker for personalized rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.