Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447654›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Social and spatial predictors of collective search behaviors.

Marion Hoffman, Tyler Thrash, Christoph Hölscher, Mubbasir Kapadia, Victor R Schinazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Collaborative Wayfinding: A Critical Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marion HoffmanInstitute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, University Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France. marion.hoffman@iast.fr.
Tyler ThrashDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, USA.
Christoph HölscherDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mubbasir KapadiaDepartment of Computer Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA.
Victor R SchinaziDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

French National Research Agency (ANR) ANR-17-EURE-0010Swiss National Science Foundation #100014_162428/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding crowd behavior is critical for designing buildings and public spaces with efficient circulation. However, the interplay of social and spatial contexts makes this endeavor challenging. This paper examines scenarios in which crowds perform a search task with time constraints, akin to individuals shopping or officers searching a crime area. We formulate and test two sets of hypotheses defined at the crowd and individual levels using desktop VR experiments. We conducted four experimental sessions that employed different social incentives (collaborative versus competitive) with a total of 140 participants, using a mixed factorial design where each individual participated in 12 trials. We found that competitive incentives produced higher levels of crowd aggregation than collaborative incentives. In addition, individuals were more likely to be influenced by others' behaviors in the collaborative compared to the competitive condition. Notably, these social signals were conveyed among participants without any verbal communication. We also developed a novel graph theoretic measure, "search attractiveness," that accurately predicts space occupation during a search task. This paper highlights the roles of social and spatial contexts in understanding occupation and aggregation.

Indexed as

CrowdingSocial BehaviorAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMotivationYoung AdultCrowd dynamicsGraph theorySpace syntaxSpatial layoutVirtual reality experiments

Identifiers

PMID40447654
PMCPMC12125397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.