Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447635›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The analysis of motion recognition model for badminton player movements using machine learning.

Xuanmin Zhu, Lizhi Liu, Jingshuo Huang, Genyan Chen, Xi Ling, Yanshuo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuanmin ZhuSchool of Physical Education, Fujian Polytechnic Normal University, Fuzhou, 350300, China.
Lizhi LiuFaculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Sanam Chandra Palace Campus, Amphoe Muang, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand.
Jingshuo HuangFaculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Sanam Chandra Palace Campus, Amphoe Muang, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand.
Genyan ChenChengyi University College, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Xi LingFaculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Sanam Chandra Palace Campus, Amphoe Muang, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand. linluojun0238@sina.com.
Yanshuo ChenScience of Physical Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350117, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze and classify the badminton players' swing actions by combining the theoretical frameworks of quantum mechanics and machine learning. A badminton stroke recognition method based on Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN) is proposed. It is then compared with traditional Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The comparison aims to assess the classification performance and robustness of each method. Firstly, this study collects the badminton players' stroke action data using high-frame-rate cameras and inertial sensors to record posture information during different strokes. OpenPose is used for human posture estimation, and combined with sensor data, spatiotemporal features during the stroke are extracted. Next, during the data preprocessing stage, Gaussian filtering is applied to remove noise, followed by normalization and feature selection to ensure the quality of the model input data. Then, SVM, CNN, and QCNN models are trained to classify different stroke actions. To evaluate model performance, precision, recall, and F1-score are selected as metrics. Experiments with varying noise levels (low, medium, and high noise) are designed to test the models' robustness. Finally, decision tree feature importance analysis is conducted to assess the contribution of different features to stroke action classification. Experimental results show that QCNN outperforms all other models in all classification tasks, with an F1-score of 0.860 for backhand intercept, significantly better than CNN (0.792) and SVM (0.753). In robustness tests under low, medium, and high noise environments, the classification precision of QCNN is 0.95, 0.92, and 0.89, respectively. This clearly surpasses both CNN and SVM. The results indicate that QCNN has strong adaptability to noisy data. Further feature analysis reveals that arm angle, twist angle, and step position are key factors affecting classification accuracy, with the highest contribution in the QCNN model. This study validates the superiority of QCNN in badminton action recognition and provides reliable methodological support for subsequent sports technique analysis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRacquet SportsHumansMovementNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineBadminton stroke action recognitionMachine learningQCNNQuantum mechanicsSVM

Identifiers

PMID40447635
PMCPMC12125242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.