ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Neural Distinction between Visual Word and Object Recognition: An fMRI Study Using Pictographs.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It remains an open question in visual neuroscience whether the recognition of written words and visual objects engages distinct neural mechanisms intrinsically, unaffected by confounding factors such as stimulus properties and task demands, and, if so, where these differences are localized. Previous studies comparing these two processes have faced challenges in simultaneously controlling stimulus properties, including low-level visual features and high-level phonological and semantic attributes, as well as task demands. Here, we addressed these issues using Chinese pictographs, visually identical stimuli that can be interpreted either as words (lexical symbols) or as objects (visual depictions) and that were rigorously matched in a visual form, phonology, and semantics. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, 36 male and female human participants performed three language tasks (realness judgment, sound retrieval, and meaning judgment) on pictographs that were contextually recognized as words or objects, with each task applied to both recognition types under identical procedures. Results revealed robust word-object differences in the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and their associated networks. Compared with object recognition, word recognition elicited stronger activation in the IPL and reduced deactivation in the ACC. Furthermore, both regions exhibited distinct multivoxel activation patterns between the word and object recognition and showed stronger functional connectivity with other brain regions specifically during word recognition. This study provides well-controlled evidence for intrinsic neural dissociations between word and object recognition, highlighting a parietal-cingulate network as a core substrate differentiating these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.