Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447448›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Neural Distinction between Visual Word and Object Recognition: An fMRI Study Using Pictographs.

Jiahong Zeng, Yudan Luo, Xiangqi Luo, Saiyi Jiao, Ke Wang, Zhenjiang Cui, Chunyu Zhao, Zhiyun Dai, Yuxin Liu, Yidong Jiang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiahong ZengNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2461-3965
Yudan LuoNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Xiangqi LuoNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Saiyi JiaoNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Ke WangNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Zhenjiang CuiNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Chunyu ZhaoNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-5585
Zhiyun DaiNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Yuxin LiuNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0009-0008-6356-7377
Yidong JiangNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Zaizhu HanNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China zzhhan@bnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1751-6452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains an open question in visual neuroscience whether the recognition of written words and visual objects engages distinct neural mechanisms intrinsically, unaffected by confounding factors such as stimulus properties and task demands, and, if so, where these differences are localized. Previous studies comparing these two processes have faced challenges in simultaneously controlling stimulus properties, including low-level visual features and high-level phonological and semantic attributes, as well as task demands. Here, we addressed these issues using Chinese pictographs, visually identical stimuli that can be interpreted either as words (lexical symbols) or as objects (visual depictions) and that were rigorously matched in a visual form, phonology, and semantics. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, 36 male and female human participants performed three language tasks (realness judgment, sound retrieval, and meaning judgment) on pictographs that were contextually recognized as words or objects, with each task applied to both recognition types under identical procedures. Results revealed robust word-object differences in the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and their associated networks. Compared with object recognition, word recognition elicited stronger activation in the IPL and reduced deactivation in the ACC. Furthermore, both regions exhibited distinct multivoxel activation patterns between the word and object recognition and showed stronger functional connectivity with other brain regions specifically during word recognition. This study provides well-controlled evidence for intrinsic neural dissociations between word and object recognition, highlighting a parietal-cingulate network as a core substrate differentiating these processes.

Indexed as

BrainPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationReadingSemanticsYoung Adultanterior cingulate cortexinferior parietal lobuleobject recognitionpictographsword recognition

Identifiers

PMID40447448
PMCPMC12244318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.