ArticleBMJ open2025
Evaluating respiratory depression after methadone administration in surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMethadone has emerged as a promising option for perioperative pain management, primarily due to its rapid onset of action and prolonged duration of effect, which provides sustained analgesic benefits. Despite its clinical advantages and minimal reported risks for postoperative respiratory depression, concerns about its potential respiratory complications persist. This protocol outlines a meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the risk of respiratory depression associated with methadone administration in the perioperative setting compared with other opioids or placebo. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic review of literature published in English from 1 January 1970 to the present using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Eligible studies will consist of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies reporting respiratory depression in surgical patients receiving intravenous methadone. Case reports, reviews and non-English studies will be excluded. The primary outcome is respiratory depression, defined as naloxone administration, a respiratory rate of fewer than 8 breaths per minute, or an arterial oxygen saturation below 90%. Secondary outcomes include the timing and dose-response effect of methadone on respiratory depression. Bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-analyses will be performed, and effect estimates will be presented as relative risks or ORs with 95% CIs. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not necessary for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences focused on perioperative medicine and pain management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42025630383.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.