ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Identification of Frailty Clusters Using Cross-Sectional Frailty and Frailty Trajectory: Cohort of Heart Failure Veterans.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a syndrome associated with increased vulnerability and diminished physiological reserves. Three-quarters (78%) of heart failure (HF) patients are frail. Traditional frailty indices (FIs) assess cross-sectional deficits, while frailty trajectories (FTs) measure changes over time.
objectivesThis study aims to examine the interaction between FI and FT to enhance risk stratification in hospitalized adults with HF.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Veterans Health Administration, including 143,687 veterans aged >50 admitted for HF from 2005 to 2019. FT measurements were derived from FI calculations for each of the 3 years before index hospitalization. Unsupervised clustering identified 4 clusters based on FI and FT interactions: low-low, low-high, high-low, and high-high. Associations between these clusters and clinical outcomes (ie, 1-year mortality, prolonged hospital stays, emergency department visits, and readmissions) were analyzed.
resultsThe study cohort was mostly older (mean age 74 ± 10 years), male (98%), and diverse (55% non-Hispanic White). Survival analysis showed distinct mortality risks across clusters; while the 2 clusters with low FI had the longest survival, the high-high group had the lowest survival probability. Adjusted logistic regression indicated that the high-high cluster had over twice the odds of 1-year mortality compared to the low-low cluster (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 2.15-2.44). The high-high cluster also had significantly higher rates of prolonged hospital stays, emergency department visits, and readmissions at 30 and 90 days postdischarge.
conclusionsIntegrating cross-sectional FI and longitudinal FT offers a comprehensive assessment of frailty in HF patients, improving risk stratification and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.