Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447320›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Differential safety profiles of durvalumab monotherapy and durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab in adult patients with advanced cancers.

Claire Morgan, John Kurland, Mayur Patel, Cathy O'Brien, Pamela Concepcion, Gary J Doherty, Stephan Hois, Alejandra Negro, Dejan Pavlovic, Karen A Robbins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claire MorganGlobal Patient Safety, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA claire.morgan@astrazeneca.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5570-4562
John KurlandLate-stage Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Mayur PatelGlobal Patient Safety, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Cathy O'BrienOncology Biometrics, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Pamela ConcepcionGlobal Patient Safety, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Gary J DohertyLate-stage Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Stephan HoisLate-stage Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Alejandra NegroLate-stage Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Dejan PavlovicGlobal Patient Safety, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Karen A RobbinsGlobal Patient Safety, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDurvalumab (D; anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) monotherapy or in combination with tremelimumab (T; anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4)) have demonstrated efficacy in advanced cancers. However, higher incidences of adverse events (AEs) and immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) were observed with D+T compared with D monotherapy in clinical trials. While safety data have been published from individual clinical trials of D with or without T, we report a comprehensive safety analysis of D and D+T in a broad population and across multiple tumor types.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using safety data pooled from phase I to III clinical trials in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), gastric adenocarcinoma, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who received either D monotherapy (N=4,045; 13 clinical trials) or D+T (N=3,319; 14 clinical trials).

resultsCompared with D monotherapy, patients treated with D+T had higher incidences of maximum grade 3 or 4 AEs (49.5% vs 39.6%), treatment-related AEs of maximum grade 3 or 4 (22.1% vs 11.5%), any imAE (30.2% vs 17.4%), and imAEs of maximum grade 3 or 4 (11.0% vs 4.3%). The majority of imAEs were non-serious, low grade and manageable in both datasets. Higher incidences of imAEs with D+T were mainly driven by diarrhea/colitis (7.6% vs 1.9%) and dermatitis/rash (4.7% vs 1.6%). Fatal imAEs were infrequent and similar between D+T and D monotherapy (0.4% vs 0.3%). Across tumor types, hypothyroid events were the most frequently reported imAE of any grade (D+T: 9.7%; D monotherapy: 7.6%). As expected, given organ involvement, pneumonitis was most frequently reported in NSCLC (D+T: 5.4%; D monotherapy: 4.7%), while hepatic events were most frequently reported in uHCC (D+T: 7.9%; D monotherapy: 6.1%).

conclusionsHigher incidences of imAEs were observed with D+T compared with D monotherapy across tumor types; however, fatal imAEs were infrequent and similar in both datasets. ImAEs in the D+T dataset were consistent with the safety profiles of the individual agents and dual PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. Overall, the safety profiles of D monotherapy and D+T were tolerable and manageable across tumor types.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddurvalumabtremelimumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmune related adverse event - irAEImmunotherapySolid tumor

Identifiers

PMID40447320
PMCPMC12128435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.