ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS), a novel multiomic algorithmic assay for stratifying outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal cancer molecular subtypes and prognostic models based on NET-related genes and oxidative stress-associated signaling.Medicine · 2026Article
- Chromatin regulator expression patterns predict prognosis and guide neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Profiling the tumor immunological status in Japanese solid cancers using the tumor immune status scoring algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- QVT score, a radiomic biomarker of vascular complexity, enables prognostication and monitoring of NSCLC immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Predictive analysis ofOncology letters · 2026Article
- Advances in the application of multi-omics in tumor immunotherapy.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Novel Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Patients with Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Toward a better pan-tumor predictive signature for unleashing precision immuno-oncology.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Stewardship of Molecular Diagnostics in Transplant Viral Infections.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the oncology treatment landscape. Despite substantial improvements for some patients, the majority do not benefit from ICIs, indicating a need for predictive biomarkers to better inform treatment decisions.
methodsA de-identified pan-cancer cohort from the Tempus multimodal real-world database was used for the development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS) algorithm leveraging Tempus xT (648 gene DNA panel) and xR (RNA sequencing) (N=1,707 development cohort; N=1,600 validation cohort). The cohort consisted of patients with advanced stage cancer with solid tumor carcinomas across 16 cancer types treated with any ICI-containing regimen as the first or second line of therapy. The IPS model was developed using a machine learning framework that includes tumor mutational burden (TMB) and 11 RNA-based biomarkers as features.
resultsIPS-High patients demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared with IPS-Low patients (HR=0.45, 90% CI (0.40 to 0.52)). IPS was consistently prognostic in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (positive/negative), TMB (High/Low), microsatellite status (microsatellite instability (MSI)-High), and regimen (ICI only/ICI+other) subgroups. Additionally, IPS remained significant in multivariable models controlling for TMB, MSI, and PD-L1, with IPS HRs of 0.49 (90% CI 0.42 to 0.56), 0.47 (90% CI 0.41 to 0.53), and 0.45 (90% CI 0.38 to 0.53), respectively. In an exploratory predictive utility analysis of the subset of patients (n=345) receiving first-line chemotherapy (CT) and second-line ICI, there was no significant effect of IPS for time to next treatment on CT in L1 (HR=1.06 (90% CI 0.88 to 1.29)). However, there was a significant effect of IPS for OS on ICI in L2 (HR=0.63 (90% CI 0.49 to 0.82)). A test of interaction was statistically significant (p<0.01).
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that IPS is a generalizable multiomic biomarker that can be widely used clinically as a prognosticator of ICI-based regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.