ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Role of high-dose interleukin-2 for melanoma in the age of cellular therapy.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microglia and neuroinflammation: function, heterogeneity, and crosstalk.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2026Review
- In vivo CAR-M therapy: advancing precision delivery and programmable immune remodeling.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Cytokine Profiling in Cutaneous Melanoma: The Emerging Role of Interleukins in Prognostic Stratification with an Up-to-Date Overview of Published Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Serum level of soluble Interleukin-2 receptor among human papilloma virus infected female patients.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- The science of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL): perspectives from the SITC Surgery Committee.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was one of the first immunotherapies in the treatment of patients with cancer. High-dose bolus IL-2 (HD IL-2) can induce durable complete or partial tumor regression in a small proportion of advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma patients. However, its potential for life-threatening side effects and requirement for inpatient administration limits its use to patients with excellent organ function treated at experienced centers. In 2024, following decades of foundational work at the National Cancer Institute, lifileucel became the first FDA-approved tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy for cancer. HD IL-2 is routinely given after TIL infusion to promote the survival and proliferation of the T cell product. In this context, fewer doses are given, and the parameters for holding an IL-2 dose are more conservative, as compared with HD IL-2 monotherapy, which has now fallen out of routine use. The lower number of doses, and possibly the effects of the preparative lymphodepletion, result in much less cytokine-related toxicity. Nevertheless, concerns related to HD IL-2 toxicity persist and possibly impact decisions to offer TIL when indicated. Here, we discuss the differences in the administration of HD IL-2 as a monotherapy vs an adjunctive therapy following TIL infusion, in an effort to demystify the toxicity of HD IL-2 in the era of cellular therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.