ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Effective CAR T-cell targeting of an MUC1 cleavage product.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapies for Breast Cancer: From Checkpoint Inhibition to Emerging Cellular Therapies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Cellular Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer: Next Therapeutics Frontiers.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe developed Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting mucin 1 (MUC1)* (muk * (muk 1 star)), which is the tumor-associated growth factor receptor form of MUC1. Our antibody, MNC2, uniquely binds to MUC1* on cancer cells but does not bind to full-length MUC1, which is expressed on all normal epithelial cells. We tested the ability of the Tyr to Phe mutations in CD3ζ, known as "1XX", to increase in vivo persistence and enable the recognition and killing of low antigen-expressing cancer cells.
methodsWe performed in vivo experiments comparing CARs with either 4-1BB or CD28 co-stimulatory domains, with or without the "1XX" Tyr to Phe mutations in ITAMs 2 and 3 of the CD3ζ signaling domain. All CARs were targeted to the tumor using the same huMNC2-scFv. To explore the sensitivity of each CAR, tumors comprising varying percentages of high MUC1* expressing cancer cells were xenografted. Further, wild-type low MUC1* expressing cells were engineered to fluoresce red while the cells engineered to express more MUC1* were made to fluoresce green. This experimental design allowed us to compare the sensitivity limits of the CARs against low versus high antigen-expressing cancer cells.
resultsAt high dose, all the CAR T cells effectively killed high antigen-expressing tumors in the short term. However, only the CAR bearing the 1XX mutations inhibited tumor recurrence in long-term experiments. Interestingly, in animals treated with CARs bearing wild-type CD3ζ, tumor recurrence was driven by the low antigen-expressing cells. Only the CAR bearing 1XX mutations demonstrated the ability to kill low antigen-expressing tumors, even when administered at low dose. Post-sacrifice analysis showed that the CAR T cells with 1XX mutations persisted longer in vivo than either 4-1BB or CD28 CAR T cells with wild-type CD3ζ.
conclusionsThese results support that the combination of targeting MUC1*, the growth factor receptor form of MUC1, with a CAR T bearing the 1XX mutations in CD3ζ has therapeutic potential for the treatment of solid tumor cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.