ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Protocol for implementation of intraoperative adverse event recording during WHO checklist sign-out.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION &
aimIntraoperative adverse events (iAEs) increase postoperative complications, which are devastating to patients and costly to healthcare systems. To optimise patient outcomes, the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) was introduced in 2008, but adherence, especially to its third part (sign-out), is low, and iAEs are currently not routinely assessed. This gap between evidence supporting the use of the WHO SSC, current inconsistent sign-out practice and the lack of standardised reporting of iAEs warrants applying an implementation science approach. Hence, this project aims to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the sign-out, including systematic recording and discussion of iAEs during the sign-out. METHODS & ANALYSIS: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach, this prospective before-and-after-cohort project includes five surgical disciplines within nine Swiss hospitals. Following an extensive context analysis, this project is set up in three phases: (1) recruitment of 40 patients per surgical discipline and site (approx. 900 in total) for baseline assessment; (2) implementation based on a multifaceted, tailored implementation strategy (including formation of implementation teams, comprehensive education of healthcare professionals, top-down leadership, regular feedback rounds and tailoring implementation to local needs); and (3) recruitment of 40 patients per discipline to assess the changes after implementation (approx. 900). Implementation (eg, checklist fidelity composed of completion and quality) and effectiveness outcomes (ie, clinical patient outcomes) will be analysed using a mixed regression model. DISCUSSION &
conclusionBy enhancing adherence to the WHO SSC sign-out, including standardised reporting of iAEs, we expect to further improve perioperative patient outcomes. Based on the context analysis, we will provide a widely applicable implementation plan to support and sustain the required behavioural change, which will support roll-out in further hospitals. Meanwhile, clinical and implementation science expertise is meeting the challenges of the complex environment of perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.